🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie is an adorable little “sweetheart”. Orion – nicknamed “Onion Ring” – is a big but guardian-like friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “constant motion” and wiggles like a wiggly creature. Lillooet the beluga is the “loving presence” with a gentle spirit.

A group of thirty enclosed marine mammals in a Canada-based entertainment facility have been entangled in a disagreement between a shuttered park, government authorities and welfare campaigners.

But those most familiar with the whales say the impassioned debate over their future often fails to consider the complexities of the whales who, after living their entire lives in confinement, have been thoroughly researched by the caretakers who see them each day.

After the national authorities prevented the export of the belugas to a foreign facility, the embattled facility near Niagara Falls where they are held stated it would consider to euthanize them unless the government covers the expense of their survival. The nation’s marine resources official has rejected that ultimatum, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable position.

Highly Cognitive Marine Mammals

Experts say that beluga whales’ neural makeup, along with their mimicry abilities, intellectual tasks and communal behavior indicate they are deeply intelligent creatures – something Kristy Burgess learned first-hand.

Burgess spent a significant period as a whale caretaker, a role that entailed earning the trust of the sea creatures.

“Establishing those connections over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of affection. At the outset, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so wonderful and gratifying.”

The trainer knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was nonetheless surprised by the details and unique traits in their characters. She developed a deep bond for two female belugas with opposing personalities.

“One whale chose me. The other made me earn it,” she said. “They transformed the way I view bonding.”

Growing Opposition and Deteriorating Conditions

Her relationship with the whales evolved against a context of increasing societal concern to their captivity.

During her three years at the park, multiple belugas and the park’s single killer whale, Kiska, passed away. In all, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since 2019, a number which the facility ascribes to natural mortality, but which activists say reflects the substandard environment in which they were kept.

The park did not admit visitors to the guests over the summer, but the former trainer says she witnessed firsthand consequences of the shutdown. “Concrete is breaking off from the enclosures because they’re falling apart and not being maintained. The whales are inquisitive and so they grab fragments and move about with chunks in their jaws. It’s upsetting to see.”

The facility did not respond to a questionnaire, but earlier stated: “The whales … obtain far better veterinary services and 24/7 supervision than any individual in the United Kingdom, or other places.”

Uncertain Future and Proposed Solutions

Burgess was terminated from the facility in recent months following the demise of a beluga, an unwell beluga the park staff had to put down. She said the facility thought details of the death were disclosed to the media and she was let go not long after.

The ambiguity over the whales’ fate has left her and other caretakers in anguish. She says the facility’s threat to kill its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “practically unfeasible” undertaking, adding any attempts to euthanize even a individual beluga would require “significant manpower”, trucks and machinery.

“It cannot happen in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess supports demands for the whales to be removed right away from the facility, with its failing enclosures and reduced personnel.

In recent months, the nation’s government official turned down a bid to send the whales to China.

“To approve the application would have meant a perpetual existence in enclosure and a return to public entertainment,” the minister stated. “As Canadians, we know that whales should be in the sea, not in enclosures for our amusement. I could not in good conscience permit an relocation that would continue the situation these belugas have endured.”

But Burgess said the official’s remarks reflect a wider lack of awareness of the facts of life for belugas raised in confinement.

“The society needs to grasp these are whales that have spent their whole lives in confinement and they will need ongoing assistance for the foreseeable future,” she said. “The public just don’t comprehend that it’s not as simple as saying ‘shut it down’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate

As authorities work to find a answer, proposals have surfaced, some of which have questionable practicality. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be freed into the wilds of northern regions – where whales are a key source of sustenance for Indigenous peoples.

A suggested refuge in the province of eastern Canada, which recently received official endorsement, has been contentious. The prospective location, which includes extensive space of penned in ocean, doesn’t yet exist. Advocates remain hopeful that it could eventually represent a sustainable solution for eight of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among staff she’s consulted, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “merely an trial” in the whales’ fate.

Others say the idea of a protected habitat represents a changing attitudes away from captive facilities and could represent a workable solution in the near future.

An official, head of the initiative, said the site will simulate the cognitive activities and feeding regimen the whales get from trainers, albeit in a significantly bigger area. He said after the well-being of whales is fully assessed, which could take months|an extended period|